Every marker represents an NHS England trust. Colors reflect the latest wait time for Trauma and Orthopaedic, with larger bubbles indicating longer delays.
Updated 18 March 2026. Comparison scope: acute trusts only. Source stack: NHS England RTT treatment and trust-level waiting-time data used on this page.
The overall backlog is shifting rather than disappearing. In the current data, the longest routine wait is 67.2 weeks at Mid And South Essex for Trauma and Orthopaedic.
Average specialty wait (latest dataset).
Longest wait in the current dataset.
Average ENT wait (Ear, Nose & Throat).
Index of overall wait pressure (100 = 30 weeks average). Updated 18 March 2026.
Current WeCovr NHS England Waiting Index (overall waiting‑time index)
July 2024 → January 2026, plotted side by side per specialty.
Darker colors indicate longer waits by month.
Each mini‑chart tracks the national average wait over time.
A few striking patterns stand out across the full time series.
Change in the WeCovr NHS England Waiting Index from the first month to the latest.
From 119.3 to 116.2.
Longest average wait (Oral Surgery) vs shortest (Elderly Medicine).
We combine official NHS England waiting‑time figures with trust‑level specialty waits to show both the national picture and local bottlenecks. Period: July 2024 → January 2026. Official 52+ week share: 3.9% → 1.9%.
Change in the WeCovr NHS England Waiting Index (higher = worse).
Mean of specialty averages.
Share of trust-specialty entries at 52+ weeks.
Change in longest wait recorded.
+5.6w (19.3w → 24.9w)
+1.2w (27.5w → 28.7w)
-5.3w (45.4w → 40.1w)
-5.1w (40.7w → 35.6w)
-4.9w (45.0w → 40.1w)
Built from official RTT treatment data and the November 2024 planning-guidance baseline. Period: Jul-24 → Jan-26.
Target: 65.0% by March 2026. Simple projection: 60.9%.
Trusts currently meeting both March 2026 expectations: at least 60% within 18 weeks and up at least 5 points versus November 2024.
Target: below 1.00% by March 2026. Simple projection: 1.67%.
Count of trusts with at least one 52+ week specialty wait.
Longest long‑wait time: 71.1w → 67.2w.
Lower‑end long‑wait time (10th percentile): 20.0w → 19.3w.
The blunt truths from the published RTT treatment data, using only the interim targets we can directly audit.
60.6% in January 2026.
23/150 matched trusts meet both March 2026 trust expectations.
1.95% of waits are still over 52 weeks in January 2026.
Worst trust: Mid And South Essex
Worst trust: Mid And South Essex
Worst trust: Mid And South Essex
Worst trust: Chesterfield Royal Hospital
Worst trust: Whittington Health
The five longest waits in the latest dataset, by trust and specialty, using acute trusts only.
Trauma and Orthopaedic
Mid And South Essex
Oral Surgery
Mid And South Essex
Other - Paediatrics
Mid And South Essex
General Surgery
Chesterfield Royal Hospital
Plastic Surgery
Whittington Health
The latest official data shows improvements in some parts of the country, but the gains are not evenly distributed.
While the national average improves, specific "red zones" are seeing waits get worse. The national drop masks deep regional inequalities—creating a two-tier system within the NHS itself.
Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) services remain a critical bottleneck. In the latest data, the worst ENT wait hits 55.5 weeks.
Why this matters: This list is heavily populated by children waiting for tonsillectomies or grommets for "glue ear." A 15-month wait for a 4-year-old represents 30% of their life spent with hearing difficulties or chronic infections, impacting speech development and education.
The traditional narrative of a "wealthy South" having better healthcare does not hold up to the current data. In fact, the new "Waiting List Capital" of England appears to be Essex, which now accounts for three of the five longest specialty waits in the country (Orthopaedics, Oral Surgery, and Dermatology).
21.8 weeks for Orthopaedics
17.6 weeks for General Surgery
51.7 weeks for Orthopaedics
49.7 weeks for General Surgery
WeCovr’s analysis gives a data-led overview of the March 2026 elective care targets, separating official RTT pathway metrics from the smaller subset of service lines with published numeric 92nd percentile waits.
National treatment performance remains 4.42% below the 65% target.
93 are already at least 60%. 33 have improved by 5 points from November 2024.
2301 have a reported numeric 92nd percentile wait, so wait-based rankings use that reported subset.
This count only covers trust-specialty lines where NHS publishes a numeric wait time. The official national target uses a different measure: the share of all waits over 52 weeks.
National 18-week performance in January 2026 is 60.58%, still 4.42% below the government’s 65% goal. Since July 2024, performance has moved by 2.67%.
National treatment performance against the March 2026 interim target.
WeCovr’s analysis shows that across 2405 trust-specialty service lines in the latest RTT dataset, 2301 have a reported numeric 92nd percentile waiting time. NHS does not publish that wait metric for every service line, so wait-based rankings use the reported subset.
Every row below is grounded in WeCovr’s analysis of the current RTT treatment dataset. Where we do not have the correct source metric, the row is explicitly removed from analysis.
| Target | Latest published | Target level | Projection / status |
|---|---|---|---|
| National treatment performance within 18 weeks | 60.6% | 65.0% by Mar 2026 | Projected 60.9% by Mar 2026 if the Nov 2024 to January 2026 pace continued |
| Trusts at least 60% and up 5 points vs Nov 2024 | 23/150 trusts currently meet both tests | Every trust to reach both tests | 93/150 are at least 60%; 33/150 are up 5 points |
| Share of waits over 52 weeks | 1.95% | <1.00% by Mar 2026 | Projected 1.67% by Mar 2026 if the Nov 2024 to January 2026 pace continued |
| Wait for first appointment within 18 weeks | Not assessed in this dataset | 72.0% nationally and 67.0% minimum per provider | Removed from analysis until the correct first-appointment dataset is available |
WeCovr’s analysis uses a single-specialty comparison to show how far apart patient experience can be for the same type of care. The dashed orange line marks the 65% interim target for treatment within 18 weeks.
85.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 21.8 weeks
25.5% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 51.7 weeks
WeCovr’s comparison highlights the strongest and weakest performers side by side in high-impact specialties. For surgical specialties, community and mental health trusts are excluded so acute hospital providers are compared like with like. Trusts with 'Healthcare' in the name are not removed automatically, because some are acute hospital groups.
85.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 21.8 weeks
81.7% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 26.1 weeks
81.2% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 28.0 weeks
80.4% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 25.1 weeks
79.2% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 28.2 weeks
25.5% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 51.7 weeks
36.8% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 67.2 weeks
41.4% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 47.7 weeks
41.4% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 45.2 weeks
41.7% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 45.8 weeks
94.2% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 16.6 weeks
93.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 16.4 weeks
84.2% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 24.1 weeks
82.2% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 25.9 weeks
81.6% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 26.0 weeks
39.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 44.8 weeks
44.8% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 49.5 weeks
44.8% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 44.0 weeks
45.7% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 46.1 weeks
45.9% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 52.2 weeks
93.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 17.6 weeks
92.4% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 16.8 weeks
91.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 18.6 weeks
90.2% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 20.7 weeks
89.0% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 21.5 weeks
25.1% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 49.7 weeks
34.7% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 50.4 weeks
34.8% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 50.5 weeks
35.6% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 47.6 weeks
37.3% within 18 weeks • 92nd percentile wait 43.4 weeks
WeCovr’s examples come only from trust-specialty lines with a published numeric wait time. They show both ends of the published-wait range, but the official national target is measured differently: as the share of all waits over 52 weeks. For surgical specialties, community and mental health trusts are excluded so acute hospital providers are compared like with like. Trusts with 'Healthcare' in the name are not removed automatically, because some are acute hospital groups.
92nd percentile wait 67.2 weeks • 36.8% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 63.9 weeks • 31.3% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 58.3 weeks • 39.9% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 57.6 weeks • 45.6% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 56.5 weeks • 26.6% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 55.5 weeks • 34.7% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 7.7 weeks • 100.0% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 7.8 weeks • 98.8% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 8.2 weeks • 100.0% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 8.3 weeks • 100.0% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 8.5 weeks • 98.3% within 18 weeks
92nd percentile wait 8.5 weeks • 100.0% within 18 weeks
For the granular view, see every hospital trust ranked against the latest RTT requirements, including who meets 60%, who improved by 5 points, and who is already at 65%.
View The Full Trust Target AuditThe government notes that more patients are being treated within 18 weeks. But the tail of the waiting list remains long. Across 2,405 trust-specialty service lines in the latest NHS RTT dataset, 2,301 have a reported numeric 92nd percentile waiting time. NHS does not publish that wait metric for every service line, so wait-based rankings use the reported subset. Within that reported subset, 40 service lines (about 1.7%) still have a 92nd‑percentile wait above 52 weeks.
This includes high-volume specialties like Oral Surgery (tooth extractions, jaw surgery) and Gynaecology. For women suffering from endometriosis or fibroids, a 54-week wait (seen in some trusts) means over a year of chronic pain and potential fertility impact before treatment even begins.
Perhaps the most concerning trend in the dataset is the deterioration of Gynaecology services. The national average wait for routine gynaecological surgery is now 41.6 weeks.
In specific trusts like Liverpool Women's and Blackpool, women are waiting over 54 weeks for treatment (54.2 weeks and 54.1 weeks respectively). For conditions like endometriosis or fibroids, which cause debilitating daily pain and can impact fertility, a year-long wait is not just an inconvenience—it is a life-altering delay.
When patients hear "Oral Surgery," they often assume it is a dentistry issue. In reality, this covers complex hospital procedures like impacted wisdom tooth removal, cyst removal, and jaw surgery.
The data shows that Oral Surgery has a high national median wait. Patients at Mid and South Essex are now waiting over 62 weeks for oral surgery. This suggests a systemic failure where the collapse of NHS dentistry is spilling over into hospital surgical lists.
National averages are moving in different directions. Oral Surgery (+0.4 weeks), Ophthalmology (+0.3 weeks), and Neurosurgery (+0.6 weeks) have all worsened, while Trauma & Orthopaedics improved slightly (-0.2 weeks). Yet the Essex outlier grew worse, showing the postcode lottery is widening even when averages stabilize.
The NHS press release highlights the hard work of staff in reducing lists. Our analysis confirms that many trusts are delivering exceptional performance—treating patients in weeks rather than months.
However, this efficiency highlights a stark "Postcode Lottery." A patient's wait time can vary by over a year depending solely on which hospital they are referred to. Below, we recognise the Top Performing Trusts in England alongside the most critical bottlenecks.
Top Performing Trust in England (Orthopaedics )
21.8w
67.2w
Top Performing Trust in England (General Surgery )
16.8w
57.6w
Top Performing Trust in England (Plastic Surgery)
11.8w
56.5w
Top Performing Trust in England (Cardiothoracic Surgery)
8.2w
52.3w
Top Performing Trust in England (Neurosurgical)
30.2w
49.7w
Top Performing Trust in England (Oral Surgery )
18.7w
63.9w
These are the longest published 92nd percentile waits in the latest RTT data, using acute trusts only for trust-vs-trust comparisons.
Trauma and Orthopaedic
Oral Surgery
Other - Paediatrics
General Surgery
Plastic Surgery
While larger hospitals often get the headlines, our data analysis identified severe delays in unexpected places. Chesterfield Royal Hospital has the worst wait for General Surgery in the country (57.6 weeks). Milton Keynes remains one of the worst bottlenecks for Gynaecology delays (53.8 weeks).
This underscores why checking your specific local trust is vital. You cannot assume a "good" hospital is good for everything. A trust might be excellent at Cardiac care but failing in Orthopaedics.
While the headlines focus on record demand, the data highlights that the NHS can still deliver speed in the right areas. Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust is delivering Orthopaedic care in about 21.8 weeks, far faster than the worst bottlenecks in the current comparison set.
This variance proves that the "National Backlog" is not a monolith. It is a series of local bottlenecks. If you have the flexibility to choose your provider (exercising your "Right to Choose") or the means to use private insurance to access under-utilised capacity, you can bypass the crisis entirely.
The private sector currently has capacity. For procedures like Cataracts, Hernias, and Hip Replacements, wait times are typically measured in days, not months. While self-pay is expensive, health insurance provides a structured way to bypass these local bottlenecks for new conditions.
Compare Health Insurance QuotesYou can embed this live "Postcode Lottery" visual on your site using the HTML snippet below.
WeCovr's NHS wait vs private cost map helps UK patients compare delays and private options, using indicative information prepared by WeCovr, an FCA-authorised insurance broking firm with over 900,000 policies issued across multiple classes of insurance. WeCovr also supports private medical insurance UK planning, while this guide explains the data.
The map compares NHS wait times by trust and specialty, alongside indicative private costs.
It uses published averages and is a guide only, not a quote or guarantee.
Highlights long NHS waits by specialty.
Estimates private treatment costs.
Supports planning for faster access.
Capacity, demand, and staffing levels can create large differences in waiting times across trusts.
WeCovr is an FCA-authorised insurance broking firm and has high customer satisfaction ratings. We also offer complimentary access to the CalorieHero AI calorie tracking app and discounts when customers take PMI or Life insurance. If you are comparing private medical insurance UK options, we can help you access private health cover through a trusted PMI broker.
This guide references NHS waiting time data and UK private healthcare pricing benchmarks.
| Factor | NHS | Private | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wait times | Longer | Faster | Varies by region |
| Cost | No fee at point | Out-of-pocket | PMI can help |
| Choice | Limited | More flexible | Depends on provider |
No. It provides indicative costs only and should be confirmed with providers.
No. Wait times are averages and can change over time.
No. Policies vary and some waits may still apply.
No. It is an informational guide only.
Get your score
Get your free Protection Score
Check how protected you are, spot the biggest gaps, and then decide what to do next.
Answer a few quick questions
See where your biggest protection gaps may be
Move into the right next step if you want help
What you get
A quick view of your current protection position
A clearer idea of where the biggest gaps may be
A direct route to tailored help if you want it